Musician Fights for His Job after Union Officials Demand Membership, Dues

Wilkofsky v. American Fed. of Musicians

CASE SUMMARY

For twenty years, Glen Wilkofsky has held his dream job as principal timpanist with the Allentown Symphony Orchestra, a success that is no small feat and one of Glen’s proudest accomplishments.

But Glen hadn’t played in the symphony since 2020. Covid shut down the symphony for a period, but Glen’s union tried to shut him out permanently. Why? Because he stopped paying union dues when he realized his money was funding union political activity he disagreed with.

Union Threatens Musician’s Job


Union officials with the American Federation of Musicians, Local 45, threatened legal action if Glen didn’t resume dues payments.

As Glen stated: “For 20 years, I always paid my dues on time. I’d given the union so much money over the years, but the minute I questioned the value they provided, they tried to intimidate me.”

He refused to be intimidated. But union officials worked with the symphony to suspend him and threaten to have him fired.


Musician Fights Back in Court


Glen found the Fairness Center and filed a federal lawsuit to defend his First Amendment rights of free speech and association. He argued that since the symphony is defined as a public-sector employer under Pennsylvania’s labor law, and his union is organized under the public-sector statute, he is a public employee, and his First Amendment rights are protected.

Therefore, Glen cannot be forced to pay a union as a condition of employment, according to the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2018 Janus v. AFSCME decision.


Supreme Court Petition


After a federal district court and the Third Circuit Court of Appeals sided with the union, Glen petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to intervene and affirm his rights under the Janus decision.

Many other Pennsylvania employees, like Glen, work for a nonprofit that could qualify as a public employer and are represented by a union certified under the state’s Public Employee Relations Act.

If the Supreme Court had accepted Glen’s case and ruled in his favor, thousands of employees could potentially lay claim to rights under Janus. However, the Court declined to hear Glen’s case.

“Union officials are gatekeepers not to a replaceable job, but to an exclusive opportunity – a dream job. Why should they care what I think? Refusing to pay means I’ll lose the job that I worked so hard to earn. But they see dozens of potential dues-paying replacements waiting in the wings” – Glen Wilkofsky

Wilkofsky v. American Fed. Of Musicians is closed.


Documents

CASE SUMMARY

For twenty years, Glen Wilkofsky has held his dream job as principal timpanist with the Allentown Symphony Orchestra.

But in 2020, Glen stopped paying union dues when he realized his money was funding union political activity he disagreed with. Then his union tried to get him fired.


Union Threatens Musician’s Job


Union officials with the American Federation of Musicians, Local 45, threatened legal action if Glen didn’t resume dues payments.

As Glen stated: “For 20 years, I always paid my dues on time. I’d given the union so much money over the years, but the minute I questioned the value they provided, they tried to intimidate me.”

He refused to be intimidated. But union officials worked with the symphony to suspend him and threaten to fire him.


Musician Fights Back in Court


Glen found the Fairness Center and filed a federal lawsuit to defend his First Amendment rights of free speech and association. He argued that since the symphony is defined as a public-sector employer under Pennsylvania’s labor law, and his union is organized under the public-sector statute, he is a public employee, and his First Amendment rights are protected. Therefore, Glen cannot be forced to pay a union as a condition of employment, according to the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2018 Janus v. AFSCME decision.


Supreme Court Petition


After a federal district court and the Third Circuit Court of Appeals sided with the union, Glen petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to intervene and affirm his rights under the Janus decision.

Many other Pennsylvania employees, like Glen, work for a nonprofit that could qualify as a public employer and are represented by a union certified under the state’s Public Employee Relations Act.

Had the Supreme Court accepted Glen’s case and ruled in his favor, thousands of employees could potentially have claimed rights under Janus.

“Union officials are gatekeepers not to a replaceable job, but to an exclusive opportunity – a dream job. Why should they care what I think? Refusing to pay means I’ll lose the job that I worked so hard to earn. But they see dozens of potential dues-paying replacements waiting in the wings” – Glen Wilkofsky, Principal Timpanist for the Allentown Symphony Orchestra

The U.S. Supreme Court declined to review Wilkofsky v. American Fed. Of Musicians.


Documents

MEDIA

Allentown Symphony Orchestra Musicians Says He Shouldn’t Have To Pay Union Dues

The Morning Call

Your View: Why I Put My Dream Job on the Line to Not Pay Union Dues

The Morning Call

April 15, 2022: “A longtime drummer with the Allentown Symphony Orchestra is suing the nonprofit and its musicians’ union arguing that it should be barred from requiring performers to pay union dues.”

May 20, 2022: “For 20 years, I always paid my dues on time. I’d given the union so much money over the years, but the minute I questioned the value they provided, they tried to intimidate me. […] Standing on principle is never easy, especially when doing so could jeopardize something you love.”

Allentown Symphony Orchestra Musicians Says He Shouldn’t Have To Pay Union Dues

The Morning Call

April 15, 2022: “A longtime drummer with the Allentown Symphony Orchestra is suing the nonprofit and its musicians’ union arguing that it should be barred from requiring performers to pay union dues.”

Your View: Why I Put My Dream Job on the Line to Not Pay Union Dues

The Morning Call

May 20, 2022: “For 20 years, I always paid my dues on time. I’d given the union so much money over the years, but the minute I questioned the value they provided, they tried to intimidate me. […] Standing on principle is never easy, especially when doing so could jeopardize something you love.”

See more cases about Membership & Dues
“I cannot say enough about how pleased I am to have the Fairness Center in my corner as my case advances, especially in this day and age of unions becoming more involved in political issues instead of unconditionally representing those for whom they were created.”
– John Grande

REQUEST FREE LEGAL HELP