The Colorado Union Observer2026-03-10T15:36:08+00:00

The Colorado Union Observer

News and opinion about litigation, legislation, and other developments that could affect Colorado labor law and employees’ rights.

Note: The content of this page does not solely reflect lawsuits filed by clients of the Fairness Center, and the opinions expressed in linked articles do not necessarily reflect the views of the Fairness Center.

Featured News

Denver Gazette Logo; black text on white background in front of city skyline

EDITORIAL: Union bill would kill choice for Colorado schoolkids

The Denver Gazette

The federally funded tax credit, which takes effect starting next year, is a win-win. It enhances options and opportunity for Colorado’s kids at no cost to the state’s strapped budget. . . The Colorado Education Association is backing a bill now afoot in the legislature to undermine Colorado’s ability to participate.

The logo of colorado politics; button graphic with blue and red lettering

Co. House Democrats again pass Labor Peace Act repeal after Gov. Polis veto last year

Colorado Politics

“The Colorado House voted 42–22 along party lines Monday to approve legislation repealing the second election required under the state’s Labor Peace Act, sending the measure to the Senate after a similar proposal was vetoed by Gov. Jared Polis in 2025.

Colorado Sun logo on white background

Nearly 3,800 JBS unionized meatpackers in Greeley plan to strike March 16

The Colorado Sun

“Nearly 3,800 meatpackers at the JBS plant in Greeley plan to walk off the job March 16 after eight months of contract negotiations reached an impasse Friday, labor union officials said. JBS employees have been working on an extension of the expired contract since July.

The logo of law 360; white lettering on blue background

Union Wins Right To Defend Colorado’s County Union Law

Law360

“A judge in Colorado federal court granted Wednesday a motion from a union group seeking to intervene to defend a Colorado statute challenged by a county that claims the law, which. . .

Chalkbeat Colorado logo; gray background with white and teal lettering

Legislators want to ask CO. voters to boost education spending amid budget woes

Chalkbeat Colorado

“[A] group of Democratic lawmakers announced during a news conference at the Capitol rotunda they’ve filed Senate Bill 135 to help solve that problem. Joined by Bergman and other Colorado Education Association union members, lawmakers said the bill would ask voters to approve a November ballot measure to increase state spending on K-12 education by 2% each year for the next 10 years.

The logo of Colorado Public Radio news; black letter on white background with orange graphic

Educators, lawmakers unveil bill that would untie education funding from TABOR rules

Colorado Public Radio

“‘We’ve all seen firsthand that Colorado’s public schools are chronically underfunded,’ said Kevin Vick, the president of Colorado Education Association, on Thursday. . . Vick, who leads the state’s largest teacher’s union with about 40,000 members, was joined by Sen. Jeff Bridges, Rep. Jennifer Bacon and education advocates at the Capitol to announce support for the bill.

Denver Gazette Logo; black text on white background in front of city skyline

Union kills safeguards for Colorado schoolkids | Jimmy Sengenberger

The Denver Gazette

District staff endorsed the concept, but when it reached the legislature, Jeffco’s union-backed board leadership went silent. During a Feb. 4 meeting, member Peter Gibbins asked the district’s lobbyist, Ed Boditch, “Do we know what the association’s view on this bill is?” He’d said the quiet part out loud: The union bosses hold sway.

Logo of CBS Colorado--black text on white background

Contentious Co. labor union bill clears first hurdle at state legislature

CBS Colorado

“Less than a year after Gov. Jared Polis vetoed a bill to overhaul Colorado’s law governing unionization, a House committee approved a new bill that’s essentially a carbon copy of the old one. . . The bill would upend the state’s 80-year-old Labor Peace Act, which requires union organizers to hold two elections to form a union.”

News of Colorado Unions

News 

Opinion 

Frequently Asked Questions

What do Colorado’s new laws mean for me?2025-06-12T15:23:56+00:00

Since 2020, Colorado has passed multiple new state laws that relate to unions and public employees. These laws allow for mandatory unionization of nearly 70,000 state and county employees. For instance, Colorado Workers for Innovative and New Solutions (WINS) Local 1876 is a union representing more than 27,000 state employees, affiliated with American Federation of Teachers (AFT), and Service Employees International Union (SEIU). Employees in several counties across the state are now unionized under AFSCME Colorado. Further statutes and regulations relating to labor law are under consideration.

NOTE: If you have questions about this topic, or think you have a legal issue, consider contacting a lawyer. Fairness Center lawyers represent clients for free and can be reached here or at 844.293.1001. We strongly encourage you to pursue with haste any legal claim you believe you may have, as the mere passage of time may prevent you from exercising possible legal claims.

Can I get legal representation for free?2025-09-29T19:21:09+00:00

The Fairness Center currently offers free legal representation in Pennsylvania, New York, Connecticut, Colorado, New Jersey and to federal employees, and may soon be expanding to other areas. The Fairness Center has represented clients involved in disputes with unions, including:

  • American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE),
  • American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME),
  • American Federation of Teachers (AFT),
  • International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW),
  • International Brotherhood of Teamsters (Teamsters),
  • Law Enforcement Employees Benevolent Association (LEEBA),
  • National Education Association (NEA),
  • National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU),
  • New York State United Teachers (NYSUT),
  • Pennsylvania State Corrections Officers Association (PSCOA),
  • Pennsylvania State Education Association (PSEA),
  • Service Employees International Union (SEIU),
  • Transportation Workers Union of America (TWU),
  • United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW),
  • UNITE Here, and more.

NOTE: If you have questions about this topic, or think you have a legal issue, consider contacting a lawyer. Fairness Center lawyers represent clients for free and can be reached here or at 844.293.1001. We strongly encourage you to pursue with haste any legal claim you believe you may have, as the mere passage of time may prevent you from exercising possible legal claims.

I don’t think my union is following our contract. What can I do?2025-03-27T17:48:35+00:00

Unions owe a duty of fair representation to all the employees in a bargaining unit they represent, whether they are union members or not. The U.S. Supreme Court has said that the duty is breached when a union’s actions toward an employee it represents are “arbitrary, discriminatory, or in bad faith.” Vaca v. Sipes, 386 U.S. 171, 190 (1967).

Many jurisdictions follow that standard, but the exact details of what the duty requires may vary by jurisdiction and circumstances.

The Fairness Center has represented clients, like Connecticut teacher John Grande, who have alleged that their union violated the duty of fair representation because they were not union members or because union officials misrepresented important information during collective bargaining, as was the case with Pennsylvania employee Mark Kiddo and his colleagues.

NOTE: If you have questions about this topic, or think you have a legal issue, consider contacting a lawyer. Fairness Center lawyers represent clients for free and can be reached here or at 844.293.1001. We strongly encourage you to pursue with haste any legal claim you believe you may have, as the mere passage of time may prevent you from exercising possible legal claims.

I’m not a union member. Does my union still have to represent me?2024-10-28T13:46:00+00:00

Unions owe a duty of fair representation to all the employees in a bargaining unit they represent, whether they are union members or not. The U.S. Supreme Court has said that the duty is breached when a union’s actions toward an employee it represents are “arbitrary, discriminatory, or in bad faith.” Vaca v. Sipes, 386 U.S. 171, 190 (1967).

Many jurisdictions follow that standard, but the exact details of what the duty requires may vary by jurisdiction and circumstances. Some states permit unions not to represent nonmembers in “individualized” grievances. Also, some states allow nonmembers to represent themselves in grievances, at least in the first stages.

The Fairness Center has represented clients, like Connecticut teacher John Grande, who alleged that their union violated the duty of fair representation because they were not union members or because union officials misrepresented important information during collective bargaining, as was the case with Pennsylvania employee Mark Kiddo and his colleagues.

NOTE: If you have questions about this topic, or think you have a legal issue, consider contacting a lawyer. Fairness Center lawyers represent clients for free and can be reached here or at 844.293.1001. We strongly encourage you to pursue with haste any legal claim you believe you may have, as the mere passage of time may prevent you from exercising possible legal claims.

What does the Janus decision mean for me?2024-10-28T13:45:40+00:00

If you are a public employee who is not a union member, you have a constitutional right not to pay fees to a union, according to the Supreme Court’s Janus v. AFSCME decision in 2018.

Some courts have said that employees who were union members but who later resigned from the union had to continue paying union dues for a period of time in some circumstances. One example is if the employee had signed a membership card or application containing certain language.

We have successfully represented clients who were told they had to pay the union when they did not want to. However, the facts and circumstances of each situation vary, and our ability to offer representation may depend on the relevant legal jurisdiction.

NOTE: If you have questions about this topic, or think you have a legal issue, consider contacting a lawyer. Fairness Center lawyers represent clients for free and can be reached here or at 844.293.1001. We strongly encourage you to pursue with haste any legal claim you believe you may have, as the mere passage of time may prevent you from exercising possible legal claims.

Know Your Rights

Go to Top